Covid Vaccine Nonsense

Submitted by Thaisleeze

Via Off-Guardian

It's a razor's edge we're walking': inside the race to develop a coronavirus vaccine | Coronavirus | The Guardian

The efforts to require every American to be injected with an experimental vaccine for Covid-19 are based on the false notion that vaccination will protect recipients from becoming infected with SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, or protect them from passing along the infection to other people.

The FDA, the CDC, the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies involved have all stated very clearly that there is no evidence to support this idea.

None of the three experimental Covid-19 vaccines now being distributed in the United States have been demonstrated to protect against infection with or transmission of the virus believed to cause Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2), or even prevent symptoms of Covid-19 disease from developing.

This fact is indisputable, yet media, medical providers, and politicians continue to repeat the lie that vaccination provides “immunity to Covid” and even sources like the Mayo Clinic make irresponsible and unsubstantiated claims that vaccination “might prevent you from getting” or “spreading” Covid-19. The same lies are the basis for President Biden’s hard press for mass vaccination to “make this Independence Day truly special.”

On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced it had “issued an emergency use authorization (EUA) for the third vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),” the Janssen (Johnson&Johnson) Covid-19 vaccine.

This announcement is virtually identical to the EUAs previously issued for Covid-19 vaccines produced by Pfizer-Biontech and Moderna.

In each of the EUAs, the FDA has been careful to avoid any claim that the vaccines provide protection against infection or transmission of the virus. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have each publicly stated that the vaccines have NOT been shown to prevent infection or transmission.

All of their regulatory documents and commentary addressing the issue state clearly that there is no evidence that the vaccines affect either infection with or transmission of the virus, nor do they prevent symptoms of Covid-19 from appearing.

The US Government Position

The FDA’s Briefing Document analyzing clinical trial data for the Pfizer vaccine, released the day before the FDA’s issuance of an EUA for that vaccine, noted (on page 47):

Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against asymptomatic infection

And:

Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 [virus] from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.

The FDA Briefing Document on the Moderna vaccine stated the same fact, while also describing plans for a future clinical trial to measure infection prevention, but that will not be completed until December 31, 2023 (p.47). The FDA’s review of the Janssen vaccine noted the same “limited” data…

to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing asymptomatic infection… and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn at this time.”

“Limited data” means there is in fact no evidence to support those conclusions.

The CDC Advisory Committee that recommended emergency use of the Moderna vaccine noted:

“the level of certainty for the benefits of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine was… type 4 (very low certainty) for the estimates of prevention of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and all-cause death.”

The CDC guidance to Covid vaccine administrators (January 2, 2021) asks:

Can a person who has received a Covid-19 vaccine still spread COVID-19? At this time, we do not know if COVID-19 vaccination will have any effect on preventing transmission.”

The World Health Organization (WHO) on January 26, 2021 similarly admitted:

We do not know whether the vaccines will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission.”

This is all very confusing due to the language the FDA, NIH and other agencies use to describe the potential effectiveness of the vaccines. For example, in the NIH analysis of the Janssen vaccine data, the authors note the vaccine’s reported effectiveness in “preventing moderate and severe COVID-19 in adults.”

This deliberately blurs the distinction between infection with a virus (SARS-Cov-2) and the illness called Covid-19.

The NIH claims the Janssen vaccine prevents or lessens symptoms of the illness Covid-19, but is silent on whether the vaccine prevents infection or transmission of the virus said to cause Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2). The similar analysis for the Moderna vaccine notes, however:

“[T]here is not yet enough available data to draw conclusions as to whether the [Moderna] vaccine can impact SARS-CoV-2 transmission.”

Unfortunately, we have seen many reports over the last few months of deaths attributed to Covid-19 days and weeks after vaccination (see here and here (video)), confirming that vaccinated people can and do become infected with the virus.

Health officials have avoided blaming these deaths on side effects from the vaccines themselves. Instead, they say these deaths are the result of infections with the virus (SARS-Cov-2) acquired after receiving the vaccines.

Particularly devastating reports from an isolated Kentucky monastery describe how two nuns died of Covid-19 after receiving Covid-19 vaccines, despite the complete absence of any cases of infection in the monastery during the ten months prior to vaccination.

Moderna’s chief science officer was quoted in the British Medical Journal about the clinical trials in 2020 that resulted in the FDA’s decision to grant a EUA to the Moderna shot:

Our trial will not demonstrate prevention of transmission,” Zaks said, “because in order to do that you have to swab people twice a week for very long periods, and that becomes operationally untenable.”

The most important questions about the experimental Covid-19 vaccines were not even asked during the clinical trials: Do these experimental vaccines prevent infection with the virus and do they prevent transmission of that virus? The short answer is No.

The FDA has stated clearly in each of the Covid vaccine Briefing Documents (see Moderna document here, Pfizer here, Janssen here) that the trials were not even designed prove or disprove a hypothesis that the vaccines prevent infection or transmission of the virus, or even prevent symptoms of Covid-19 from developing.

The FDA issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for the Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen vaccines on December 11 and December 18, 2020, and on February 27, 2021, respectively.

The EUAs indicate that the vaccines “prevent severe Covid-19,” that is, they don’t prevent infection or development of symptoms after infection, but they may make the illness less severe.

The EUAs explicitly deny any evidence that the Pfizer, Moderna or Janssen vaccines prevent infection, or prevent hospitalization or even death from Covid-19 after vaccination. The highly publicized “success rates” of the vaccines refer only their potential ability to lessen the severity of those symptoms, but there is “no data” that they prevent the infection that could cause those symptoms.

Mandating Vaccination Under Emergency Use Authorization is Impermissible

An EUA is not “FDA Approval.”

An EUA indicates that a product has not been fully tested but, despite the obvious risks, distribution is permitted because the government declared a “public health emergency” in January 2020.

As the FDA notes in its Information Sheet for the Moderna shot:

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA- approved or cleared product.”

The FDA granted EUAs for all three experimental vaccines after less than five months of clinical trials, with most of trial data still to be collected. All three vaccines will be in clinical trial status through January 31, 2023.

According to comments from vaccine scientists in September 2020 (prior to the Covid-19 EUA issuances), no vaccine had ever before been distributed on an EUA basis.

“We don’t do EUAs for vaccines,” [Dr. Peter] Hotez said, “It’s a lesser review, it’s a lower-quality review, and when you’re talking about vaccinating a large chunk of the American population, that’s not acceptable.”

Three months later, the FDA issued EUAs for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, but with explicit guidance that the vaccine “has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA- approved or cleared product.”

Indeed, the highly experimental nature of the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine, in particular, is extraordinary as that vaccine is the first and only product the company has ever been allowed to distribute, and it was allegedly developed in only two days.

Any use of an experimental vaccine under an EUA must be voluntary and recipients must be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

This information is repeated in small print on each of the FDA Covid-19 vaccine Fact Sheets, but it is largely ignored.

Dr Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked in October 22, 2020, if the new Covid-19 vaccines could be legally required. She responded that, under a EUA:

Vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandatory.”

Under EUA status, the government is not permitted to require Covid-19 vaccinations because the vaccines are not FDA-approved and recipients are clinical trial participants. This is why states cannot legally require vaccination, despite suggestions by some legislators to do just that.

Indeed, the US military is barred from mandating the vaccines. This ban on government vaccine mandates explains why some private companies are trying to require vaccination of employees, which makes the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance on this issue potentially relevant.

The EEOC Guidance on Covid-19 Vaccination Does Not Authorize Vaccine Mandates

The EEOC updated its guidance on the issue of Covid-19 vaccination on December 16, 2020.

This update appeared five days after the FDA issued an EUA for the Pfizer vaccine and two days prior to issuing the Moderna EUA. Based on this timing, we can safely assume that the EEOC was well-aware of the contents of the FDA briefing documents and Fact Sheets, specifically the FDA statements about the lack of proof that the vaccines prevent infection with or transmission of the virus (SARS-CoV-2).

The EEOC guidance evaluates the idea of employer Covid-19 vaccine mandates under the Americans with Disabilities Act’s (ADA) “direct threat” analysis:

The ADA allows an employer to have a qualification standard that includes ‘a requirement that an individual shall not pose a direct threat to the health or safety of individuals in the workplace.’“

But the EEOC’s analysis presupposes that vaccines protect against infection, which is false.

The “direct threat” doctrine is an employer’s potential defense to a claim of disability discrimination under the ADA. According to the EEOC, “A conclusion that there is a direct threat would include a determination that an unvaccinated individual will expose others to the virus at the worksite.”

The specific but theoretical “direct threat” described here is one allegedly posed by an unvaccinated person who might become infected with the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and then spread infection to the workplace.

But no “determination” of such a threat is possible. The EEOC was careful to state only that a direct threat defense “would include” such a “determination.” The EEOC took no position on this issue because officials there were likely aware there has been no determination that vaccination prevents infection or transmission, and none is possible with current data.

Aspirational claims that vaccination “might” [be eventually be shown to] prevent infection or that “some data tends to show” such an effect are insufficient bases for a direct threat defense.

The US Supreme Court ruled in Bragdon v Abbott (1988) that the assertion of a direct threat defense must be evaluated “in light of the available medical evidence,” noting that “the views of public health authorities, such as the U.S. Public Health Service, CDC, and the National Institutes of Health, are of special weight and authority.”

Overcoming the long-standing protections of the right to bodily integrity and informed, voluntary consent to medical treatment requires articulation of an actual and imminent, not theoretical, threat presented by an unvaccinated person in the workplace.

The CDC, the National Institutes of Health and numerous other “public health authorities” have all stated that there is no evidence to show that vaccination prevents viral infection or transmission, a fact the EEOC should have presented but did not.

The EEOC guidance does not provide any legal cover for employers to require vaccination. The guidance proposes that employers might be successful in proving a direct threat if they were able to prove facts which, it turns out, cannot be proven.

Even more importantly, according to the CDC, more than 29 million Americans (and likely many, many more) have already contracted the virus (SARS-CoV-2) and recovered from it.

A recent NIH study demonstrates that these millions of “recovered” people have long-lasting, and likely permanent protection from re-infection. They present no threat of infection or transmission of the virus. However, under a blanket employer vaccine requirement, these people who are already immune would still be required to get vaccinated. It makes no sense logically or legally to require the vaccination of people who already have more protection from the virus than people who get vaccinated.

What is the Threat Prevented by Mandatory Vaccination?

Outside the employment context, companies are demanding proof of vaccination from travelers and even movie- and concert-goers, based on the same debunked idea that vaccination with one of the Covid-19 vaccines will prevent the theoretical spread of the virus in trains, planes, movie theaters and concert halls among low-risk populations. But the relevant government agencies have all stated clearly that that the vaccines do not prevent infection or the spread of infection.

The benefit from any vaccination lies with the recipient of the vaccine. In the case of Covid-19 vaccines, vaccinated people may have fewer symptoms after becoming infected. While this is an important consideration for many people, this benefit has nothing to do with preventing the spread of the virus SARS-Cov-2.

A vaccinated person presents at least the same “risk” of infection and transmission of the virus (if not more risk) as a person who is not vaccinated. At best, vaccination might prevent a more serious case of Covid-19 illness from developing. The vaccines do not prevent infection or the spread of the virus that causes Covid-19. They can have little or no impact on stopping transmission.

Because no one has shown that vaccination prevents infection or transmission of the virus SARS-CoV-2, a fact undisputed by all official sources, this also means that vaccination cannot help to achieve the goal of herd immunity.

“Herd immunity” means that a population can be protected from a virus after enough of the population has become immune to infection, either through exposure to the virus and later recovery, or through vaccination.

But with Covid-19, there is no proof that vaccination makes anyone immune to the virus SARS-CoV-2. Covid-19 vaccination cannot play any meaningful role in the pursuit of herd immunity because the Covid-19 vaccines do not provide immunity from infection.

Oddly, the WHO contradicts itself in arguing that Covid-19 vaccination promotes herd immunity to the virus that causes Covid-19, claiming:

To safely achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, a substantial proportion of a population would need to be vaccinated, lowering the overall amount of virus able to spread in the whole population.”

This statement is simply false. It also contradicts the WHO’s prior admission that “We do not know whether the vaccines will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission.”

If the WHO has already acknowledged that it “does not know if” the Covid-19 vaccines protect people from becoming infected or transmitting the virus, it is a deliberate lie to claim that somehow these vaccines can lead to herd immunity.

A far more useful strategy than forcing people to accept an experimental vaccine that does not even protect them from infection would be to instead protect those most vulnerable to serious illness or death as a result of infection. Tens of thousands of renowned doctors and scientists in the U.S. and around the world proposed such a strategy in October 2020.

Unfortunately, the media and Silicon Valley tech monopolies attacked and effectively censored discussion of this common sense approach as “anti-science” and “right wing” by removing discussion of the proposal from nearly all media platforms.

Yet the fake “scientific” approach to herd immunity touted by the WHO, US government agencies and politicians, and media monopolists is blatantly dishonest, and has nothing to do with “science.” The push by private companies to require vaccination and “immunity passports” is similarly based on private financial interests, not scientific research.

Government scientists admit that the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus they say causes Covid-19, but many of these same scientists also dishonestly claim the vaccines will somehow prevent the spread of the virus, leading to herd immunity.

Such an approach is not only unscientific and dishonest. It’s nonsense.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise

50
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Freddy Uranus
Freddy Uranus

The tens of millions of average normies will not read an article like this attempting to explain in detail the efficacy of the vaccine and the propaganda campaign attached to it. They will lay on the couch and have a talking head in a box tell them what to do. It’s just easier. And that is why the vaccine “nonsense” works.

TheAssegai
TheAssegai

Additionally, the very scary image of the so-called virus at the top of the article is a computer generated/artist rendering of something. SARS-CoV2 has never been isolated and therefore no electron microscope imaging has been done.

Ouirphuqd
Ouirphuqd

The deep state won’t be happy until it is a complete mob panic. Let’s egg them on by putting an alka seltzer in our mouths, then walk into Walmart screaming the virus has mutated!

Underwood
Underwood

Asymptomatic infection provides immunity, which is why the U.S. is at or near a herd immunity state.

Mary Christine

You just made a statement you can’t prove. There are no people walking around with CONvid that have no symptoms. A study out of China that included millions of Chinese proved that there was no asymptomatic spread.

Study of Ten Million Finds No Evidence of Asymptomatic COVID Spread

Anonymous
Anonymous

Is there anything from China that can be believed?

J Bennett
J Bennett

“Underwood” did NOT say anything about asymptomatic “SPREAD” .. only that it provided “immunity”

prester kahn
prester kahn

NOT what he said. If you are infected, but your case is without symptoms, you will still develop immunity to further infection. (antibodys and B/T cell memory)

Nurse Ratched
Nurse Ratched

I think they are relying on the threat to push people. I had to talk a coworker out of it, she has an unvaccinated daughter and doesn’t buy any if the COVID hype, but she booked a vx appointment because “eventually they’re going to make us do it”. My response: “Why jump the shark!? Wait for them to make you, it’ll be at least a year, maybe more.”. My plan, wait for the mandate, let them threaten me, if they fire me, sue em. I’ve had a religious objection to the flu vx on file for years, and don’t take that one either. Even when I worked in ER.

Anonymous
Anonymous

Oh no, virus’ mutate. No way Jose.

https://odysee.com/@EJOK:c/WIN_20210322_11_20_45_Pro:a

Llpoh
Llpoh

I got banned from an Oz site for saying this, just today. Not allowed to speak about this stuff.

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load

Truly fucking amazing. Like I’ve been saying for years now…G.R.E.E.D

Tabernac
Tabernac

In yesterday’s article on this page ,Yeadon retired Pfizer VP, says if it was greed then they would just raise the price. Therefore it must be something else. He uses the words evil and depop.

Auntie Kriest
Auntie Kriest

Dr. Yeadon is correct of course.

Tabernac
Tabernac

I don’t know if he is correct but he seems measured and knowledgeable and his resume checks out. I guess we get to decide what’s correct. Here is 4 minutes of him 6 months ago. “you be the judge”

ASIG
ASIG

The most important comment is “SOMETHING ODD IS GOING ON”!!

Tabernac
Tabernac

and that was six months ago- now he says evil and depop…our positions change with more/new info. Or his seems to.

grace country pastor

The evil depopulation efforts will lead to more concentrated wealth in “their” hands.

brian
brian

The brainwashing is deep and thoroughly entrenched. Had a guy yesterday come to my place to buy a dovetail jig. Drove up in a mask. Younger fella maybe mid 30’s. I told him immediately the mask was not nessecary, nobodies sick. He started bragging that he was one of the first people in Penticton to get the jab. He wouldn’t drop the mask and was constantly ‘adjusting’ it.

Its pointless talking to zombies. So I took his money and sent him on his way… good luck with that jab.

Stucky

You should have Jabbed him with your Jig.

Mary Christine

None of this matters. The injection manufacturers have already filed for full FDA approval. Expect them to get it later this year. Maybe as early as this summer. Unless people start dropping like flies immediatly after injected, they will get their full FDA approval. Mark my words. I’m beginning to think that Billy Goats plan to reduce the population will be moving full steam ahead.

https://www.foxnews.com/health/pfizer-request-full-approval-coronavirus-vaccine-first-half-2021-fda

“Once filed, we expect the FDA to make a final decision in the second half of 2021.”

Mary Christine

The kids will be next. Fund your own study and say it’s 100% effective. What a nice CON game they have going.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/pfizer-and-biontech-say-trial-of-covid-vaccine-was-100-effective-in-phase-3-trial-of-adolescents-2021-03-31?mod=home-page

B. Les white
B. Les white

Death aside, nothing is 100%

Anonymous
Anonymous

Death and taxes

B. Les white
B. Les white

You can skirt taxes. Just need yourself a bunch of lobbyists and lawyers. Just ask Lie-awatha Warren

Steve
Steve

The whole distribution of these vaccines is BASED ON A LIE.
The EUA(emerg use authorization) specifically demands that no alternative treatment exists. Only when no alternative therapy exists can an EUA be authorized.
It is and has been widely known (although stridently suppressed and denied) there are alternative therapies that are highly effective. Namely, Ivermectin and HCQ.
BASTARDS.

Auntie Kriest
Auntie Kriest

Evil bastards.

Guest
Guest

You know the phenomenon of experimental injection bragging…
Our customers do it all the time. Don’t usually comment unless they ask if we’re getting. Then just say, no, it’s experimental. They’re customers after all.
Just yesterday:

We had a customer call (from Seattle) saying he and his wife were taking a vaccine celebration vacation and coming here to drop off an item for repair. He got here and first words out of his mouth were, it’s ok I’m vaccinated. And bravely even shook hands. However it was unsettling because you would move and he would back away from you.

A person working here told us his elderly dad got his THIRD injection and wasn’t doing too well. They live In Idaho and by previous comments seems like a very smart person- a real inventor.

Vigilant
Vigilant

Go further down the rabbit trail way back to Pasteur vs. Bechamp, and germ THEORY vs. terrain theory. Viruses are exosomes, a solvent made inside your cells to cleanse your cells when the normal cleaning process becomes overloaded. Detox to prevent cold and flu symptoms, and give yourself proper nutrition instead of the S.A.D. junk food. You won’t have to worry about “catching” anything if you are taking proper care of yourself.

If you breathe in and need oxygen, of which your bloodstream carries to nourish every one of your cells, then for heaven’s sake don’t wear a suicide muzzle.

mark
mark

Sucicide mask? Just saw this???

Moving Black Strands On Face Mask Video 2 – Similar Videos Appearing Daily Now

Vigilant
Vigilant

I hadn’t seen this yet, thank you for posting! I’m on a phone and don’t know how to share this important video. I think that it said that it came from TikToc, which I know nothing about.

In today’s news:
Study: Chemical That Decreases Fertility And Causes Penises To Shrink, Found In Face Masks

Phthalates has been linked to genital shrinkage, decreased fertility rates, and less masculine behavior in young boys.

Study: Chemical That Decreases Fertility and Causes Penises to Shrink, Found in Face Masks

Vigilant
Vigilant

Graphene & mysterious black fibers found on the face masks

…these strands exhibit the characteristics of very small-scale micro-robots, in that they move in response to heat and moisture. Are these approved swabs and masks being used to deliver synthetic biology into their human hosts? Is that why Joe Biden issued an Executive Order that disallows bandannas on public transport, in favor of Chinese PPEs?

Scroll down for the 2 minute video
https://www.shiftfrequency.com/moving-black-strands-on-face-mask-video/

John

One of the best researched articles on the Covid gene therapy injection. Good Work! God gave all of us an immune system to keep us healthy which has worked for thousands of years. Due to our lifestyle, eating habits, and age, we should fortify our immune system during every flu season to keep it in top notch condition. And IF a virus happens to get past it, we also have very inexpensive cures to deal with that IF you can get them in your country as many health authorities have blocked these medications in order to force everyone to take the profitable injection. Those that did this are the ones that will spend a long long time in the lake of fire and rightfully so.

Anonymous
Anonymous

It does make one wonder why when the whole world was under complete lockdown nothing was said in media about how to improve an individual’s immune system or even maintain one’s current health status. It was all about staying safe.

Anonymous
Anonymous

If it were ONLY nonsense, we’d be ok. They have way more in mind for us than nonsense.

https://odysee.com/@EJOK:c/WIN_20210320_14_34_03_Pro:9

Long Time Lurker
Long Time Lurker

“the government is not permitted to require Covid-19 vaccinations”

Government is an unchecked evil, and will do whatever it wants. I’m the government and I identify as evil.

olde reb

Covid-19 is only the beginning. It is being used to acclimate the public to accept deprivation, poverty and bankruptcy by confusion over a bogus dilemma. $1.9 trillion government spending, and more (i.e., bankruptcy), is touted as the remedy to the economic chaos of Covid.

An academic study of poverty being imposed upon historic societies by leading the nation into bankruptcy for the benefit of financial entities has been made. Ref.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1717949 .

The United States is being led down this same path. Interest rates on Treasury securities are being driven to negative values which will not be acceptable to the market. The balance sheet of the Fed has already ballooned from securities that they cannot sell. [Question: What is the due date of those securities ?] When the debt is not marketable, the nation is bankrupt and the market value of $27 trillion National debt drops to pennies.

[Those who see the crash of bond value transfer assets to equity. The added value escalates equity markets and shows up as inflation. Financiers have greater value in equity markets than bond markets.]

Eventually Primary Dealers, tasked with collecting maturing Treasury securities, buy bonds at vastly discounted prices but demand face value from the government. The FRBNY has exclusive authority to redeem T-securities [ref. 31 USC 375.3. The accounts, handling $1T govt money annually, have NEVER been audited]. FRBNY is also theorized to be controlled by select Primary Dealers on Wall Street. [ Ref. http://stateofthenation.co/?p=20475 , Federal Reserve for Dummies.] The same WS entities control the U.S. Treasury. Control of all government decisions will be usurped by Wall Street interests as was done in Greece, Argentine, and other nations as detailed in the academic study.

Anonymous
Anonymous

I looked at both links you referenced. Holy Cow!!! I am nowhere near a financial wizard. I will be studying the article at the second link and its references to get more educated.

prester kahn
prester kahn

Careful, the 2nd link is a Columbian website and is unsecured. The first one is dead.

olde reb

The first link is a bit difficult to scroll down to and locate. The 91 page Seattle University school of Law pdf file is file:///C:/Users/old_reb/AppData/Local/Temp/SSRN-id1717949.pdf It is also in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 42 .

An alternate to the second link is https://ppjg.me/2020/07/22/the-federal-reserve-for-dummies/. The site is in Minnesota but her web-host gave her a European [ME] tag. A graduate school professor guided the research—which is slammed by the Fed.

[son of a gun, I tried the first link and it failed. Found the page at : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1717949 but that is the same.]

Rusty Pipes
Rusty Pipes

I don’t trust the government or the pharmaceutical corporations. NO to the vaccine. Period.

J Bennett
J Bennett

Lots to worry about and it looks like it’s ALL tending toward the depopulation projected at Deagel.com (Population in 2017 projected to 2025: US 326M to 99M, Germany 80M to 28M, UK 65M to 14M, Israel 8.3M to 4M)

But it’s not all Covid and Injections. China, N Korea, Russia and Iran all getting frisky since Biden took office. I’m reading a lot of speculation about an EMP attack (warned years ago by Newt Gingrich) to wipe out our electrical grid. (Only Texas has it’s own separate grid and I understand the huge generators we use are made in China and take 6 months to produce.)

On top of that, there were over 600 small quakes on March 30 (1 day) in the Cascadia Subduction Zone which is overdue to snap. (https://pnsn.org/tremor?starttime=2021-03-30T00:00:00&endtime=2021-03-30T23:59:59&coloring=red&magnitude=false). The New Madrid fault is overdue and several of the faults in New York City are way overdue to pop.

It’s almost like “choose your poison” time. I think I’m gonna find a cave and crawl into it.

prester kahn
prester kahn

Not to mention that the main transformers needed for the main high-tension transmission system take over a year to manufacture and there are none in inventory. And yes – an EMP will take them out.

J Bennett
J Bennett

Wow! I don’t think people today are up to it when having to live without electricity. Six months would be bad enough, but millions would die if they had to wait a year or more. Just look at the run on grocery stores when bad weather is announced. Most people don’t keep any extra food/water on hand to be able to live for a few weeks or months.

I’m not sure what kind of damage can be cause by an EMP, but I’ve read where it can knock out circuitry in motor vehicles. If so, most trucks would be dead in the water and unable to deliver groceries to restock stores around the nation.

Computers control the water treatment plants that deliver potable water to your house. If those systems are fried, you’d need to boil water before drinking it.

Anonymouse
Anonymouse

So if it is scientifically proven the gene therapy shot does not prevent the virus what the hell are they FARCING this unproven gene therapy on everybody for???

THINMK!!!

Thunderdolt
Thunderdolt

THINMK!!!

Is that MK-ULTRA LITE?

Anonymous
Anonymous

Are you not familiar with the Georgia Guide Stones???

Ed
Ed

So…..the “vaccine” isn’t made from an actual virus specimen, but is instead a gene altering treatment. Wonder why that is? Maybe it’s because there was no virus specimen to be had, because the covid19 killer plague virus is imaginary. That must be it.

Anonymous
Anonymous

No, it’s not made from a specimen, yes it is a gene therapy. The covid-19 virus has never been isolated so no specimen and no electron microscope photos.

J Bennett
J Bennett

I just looked this up and found there’s a problem in “terminology”. Covid-19 is the DISEASE … caused by the SARS-COV2 VIRUS. The CDC HAS isolated the virus and it’s available for research. (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html)

However, “Anonymous” (below) is correct. The injection is NOT produced using the SARS-COV2 virus but is actually a gene therapy of some sort. I think it has something to do with the Spike1 protein. Perhaps signaling the cells to create or identify this protein and cause an immune response. My brain is addled with all the info I’ve read lately. Maybe someone else has more knowledge of this Spike1 protein and how it works.

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading